Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Nadegda Newsgroups: alt.free.newsservers,rec.arts.tv,comp.lang.lisp,comp.lang.java.programmer,alt.usenet.kooks Subject: Re: "Then it's a simple matter of following your socks." Followup-To: alt.usenet.kooks Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 10:02:22 +0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 44 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 10:02:22 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8343aabd53e4b23ea8a6b914f8825eeb"; logging-data="11575"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ix8U+jJKy+USSzj1U0BsKwZoEt8ELtbg=" X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 Cancel-Lock: sha1:PG7A4tScFmDT14rYJg6XKNeU/w4= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.lisp:10891 comp.lang.java.programmer:16961 On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 04:52:27 -0600, Capa EspĂ­rito wrote: > one busted puppet wrote: > > [...] > >>SPNAK!!!!! >> >>You can keep posting more of this so-called "evidence". I can keep >>poking holes in it. So when do you give up, kooky? > > Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:17:19 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: > SPNAK!! > Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:26:10 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: > SPNAK!! > Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:30:45 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: > SPNAK!! > Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:31:15 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: > SPNAK!! > Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:32:03 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: > SPNAK!! > Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:36:01 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: > SPNAK!! > > Posting the same message six times in 16 minutes! Your message is lost, > I definitely do not believe any of your bluster now. Actually, I posted messages with substantially different post bodies poking yet more holes in Account Banned's so-called "evidence", kooky. There *is* one message that's present in three copies, but that's Eternal September's fault. I don't know what went wrong, but that message was "stuck sending" for quite a bit longer than normal in Agent. I'm assuming that E-S failed to acknowledge receiving the post, but posted it anyway, and Agent made some automatic retries before finally deciding it had successfully posted the article. Regardless, it was not intentional on my part and is hardly comparable to your own history of giant EMPs -- of which you have another tonight, I note, one copy in aioe.news.helpdesk, one in eternal-september.support, and two more copies each with a five- group crosspost, for a grand total of 12 copies and a BI of about six. > PLONK on Seamus Coward.