Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: David Lamb Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Java processors Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 13:22:21 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: <5f101d00-4bc9-4750-939c-cd53605bfa0e@googlegroups.com> <4ff6318d$0$283$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <9diev791cc84tsljqusgl14shpseba19o7@4ax.com> <89ca24f7-0bf9-4d4b-be91-ef131989c4c9@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:22:34 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="c397b0271b118225329a50c7668d0388"; logging-data="6977"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/9YyRL5xO/eZ/7Pz0+azER" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:CxEe1axGyfuicqMOOLZkwwoawdQ= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:16046 On 08/07/2012 8:56 PM, Lew wrote: > It wouldn't make sense to keep old compilations around. They're based on > runtime conditions that by definition have changed or the old one would > still be valid. It has been a long time since I worked on optimizing compiler technology, but my fragmented memories suggest that it's not "all or nothing" with regard to what information you need for optimization. Some intra-procedural data flow analysis remains valid even if inter-procedural or inter-class information changes, and some optimization only depend on local information.