Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,rec.arts.tv,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: NOMINATION: tholen for Clueless Newbie (was Re: JUNE 2012 KOOK AWARDS - Offishul Voting Ballot)
Followup-To: alt.usenet.kooks
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 11:21:24 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <jteerj$a7f$5@dont-email.me>
References: <jslhh1$3ge$1@news.mixmin.net> <jte2fk$gvj$1@dont-email.me> <25ec8fb2-ab2c-451d-ba70-3583626f736c@m2g2000pbv.googlegroups.com> <jtee1o$a7f$2@dont-email.me> <66c02d32-2129-4a7a-987a-cce28a4fd183@l6g2000pbf.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 11:21:24 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="EPhvT9r9xtm89jEpPZw+ug"; logging-data="10479"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/HmjPz0xpxbjEMIX2P1E6a3D5MqkWnnjQ="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Pi6sRzQHAoTPsjPgCfACM3CPi6Q=
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.os2.advocacy:9215 comp.lang.java.programmer:15893

On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 04:15:50 -0700, tholen@antispam.ham wrote:

> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> writes:
> 
> 3> Newsgroups:
> 
alt.usenet.kooks,rec.arts.tv,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.lang.java.programmer
> 
> 3> That's an odd suggestion to make of someone who had just made her
> first
> 3> ever post to an OS/2 newsgroup, tholen.
> 
> Classic illogic on your part, Nadegda, given that obsession can manifest
> itself in the reading of a newsgroup as well.

No such hypothetical obsession could manifest itself to someone thousands 
of miles away, because you can't see who's been lurking in your OS/2 
newsgroup or for how long, now, can you?

> And the only way that someone could logically make the claim that I've
> posted a response to "*every* *single* *article* in
> comp.os.os2.advocacy" would be to read "*every* *single* *article* in
> comp.os.os2.advocacy", Nadegda.

Or perhaps your reputation preceded you, sweetie. Ever think of that?

> Of course, if you had really done that, you'd know that your claim is
> quite false.  But hey, kooks like you never let the truth get in the
> way of their obsession, Nadegda.

Calling a kookologist a kook *again* nets you an immediate nomination for 
CNoTM. Enjoy!