Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #15875

Re: Java processors

From BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Java processors
Date 2012-07-08 10:36 -0500
Organization albasani.net
Message-ID <jtc9iv$q7v$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <jt4kr2$mdd$1@news.albasani.net> <jt4mht$glm$1@dont-email.me> <4ff6318d$0$283$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <jt5okh$53a$1@dont-email.me> <MPG.2a63ac094c5d0401989719@202.177.16.121>

Show all headers | View raw

On 7/8/2012 8:40 AM, Wanja Gayk wrote:
> In article <jt5okh$53a$1@dont-email.me>, esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid
> says...
>
>>       My colleague's point was that JITting the code, aggressively
>> or not, is pre-execution overhead: It is work spent on something
>> other than running your code.
>
> Thet's a pretty single threaded point of view.
>
>> If you just dove in and started
>> interpreting you might be running more slowly, but you'd have a
>> head start: Achilles is the faster runner, but cannot overcome
>> the tortoise's lead if the race is short.
>
> In fact optimiziation, profiling an compiling can be done while the code
> is being interpreted.
>

potentially, but some profiling activities will risk reducing 
interpreter performance, since they have to be done inline with 
interpreting the code (for example, updating counters, ...).

if the program is both multi-threaded and CPU bound, then the effects of 
a JIT running in a different thread may be visible, but granted, it is 
also fairly unlikely for many apps (many are not CPU-bound, and many of 
which are CPU bound have most of their activity concentrated in 1 or 2 
threads anyways).


>>       I dunno: Are JIT's nowadays smart enough to recognize code
>> that will (future tense) execute too few times to be worth JITting?
>
> As far as I know it does take things like simple loop counters into
> account when comparing invocation counts to the compilation threshold,
> so it can compile more eagerly.
>

yep.

a simple strategy like "compile this code once it has been executed N 
times" actually works reasonably well.

code executed less than this remains interpreted, and probably isn't 
really a huge time-waster anyways, whereas code which is executed often 
will more quickly trigger the JIT to "do its thing" (causing it to go 
faster).

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Java processors bob smith <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2012-07-05 08:01 -0700
  Re: Java processors Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-07-05 11:28 -0400
    Re: Java processors BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-07-05 13:00 -0500
      Re: Java processors Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-07-05 14:31 -0400
        Re: Java processors BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-07-05 16:42 -0500
        Re: Java processors Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-07-05 20:30 -0400
          Re: Java processors BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-07-05 21:12 -0500
          Re: Java processors Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-07-06 00:13 -0400
            Re: Java processors Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-07-06 13:26 -0700
              Re: Java processors Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-07-06 13:50 -0700
                Re: Java processors Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-07-06 14:17 -0700
                Re: Java processors Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-07-06 19:07 -0700
                Re: Java processors BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-07-07 09:34 -0500
                Re: Java processors Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-07-07 21:01 -0700
                Re: Java processors BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-07-08 00:28 -0500
                Re: Java processors Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-07-07 23:00 -0700
                Re: Java processors BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-07-08 10:20 -0500
                Re: Java processors Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-07-08 09:16 -0700
                Re: Java processors Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2012-07-08 17:46 +0000
                Re: Java processors Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-07-08 11:52 -0700
                Re: Java processors Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2012-07-08 21:41 +0000
                Re: Java processors Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-07-08 17:56 -0700
                Re: Java processors Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-07-08 19:44 -0700
                Re: Java processors Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-07-09 23:41 -0700
                Re: Java processors David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2012-07-16 13:22 -0400
                Re: Java processors Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-07-16 14:03 -0700
                Re: Java processors Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-07-08 19:42 -0700
                Re: Java processors Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-07-10 01:13 +0200
                Re: Java processors Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-07-09 16:26 -0700
                Re: Java processors Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-07-11 15:41 -0700
                Re: Java processors Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-07-12 01:02 +0200
                Re: Java processors Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2012-07-21 18:46 +0200
                Re: Java processors Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-07-21 13:05 -0400
                Re: Java processors Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2012-07-21 19:23 +0200
                Re: Java processors Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-07-21 14:10 -0400
                Re: Java processors Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2012-07-23 01:17 +0200
                Re: Java processors Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-07-22 20:15 -0400
                Re: Java processors Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-07-22 15:13 +0200
                Re: Java processors Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-07-06 19:03 -0700
                Re: Java processors Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-07-08 19:51 -0700
              Re: Java processors Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-07-07 21:17 -0700
                Re: Java processors Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-07-07 23:04 -0700
                Re: Java processors Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-07-08 09:29 -0700
                Re: Java processors Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-07-08 11:57 -0700
            Re: Java processors Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2012-07-08 15:40 +0200
              Re: Java processors BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-07-08 10:36 -0500
          Re: Java processors Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-07-06 11:31 -0700
      Re: Java processors Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2012-07-05 13:02 -0600
        Re: Java processors BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-07-05 16:09 -0500
        Re: Java processors Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2012-07-06 01:29 +0200
          Re: Java processors Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2012-07-06 00:42 +0000
            Re: Java processors Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-07-06 13:53 -0700
              Re: Java processors Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2012-07-06 21:18 +0000
                Re: Java processors Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-07-06 18:17 -0400
                Re: Java processors Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2012-07-06 22:29 +0000
                Re: Java processors Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-07-06 19:10 -0700
                Re: Java processors BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-07-07 09:42 -0500
                Re: Java processors Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-07-07 10:58 -0400
                (OT) Was: Re: Java processors Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-07-07 11:38 -0400
                Re: (OT) Was: Re: Java processors Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-07-07 21:19 -0700
                Re: (OT) Was: Re: Java processors "Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-usenet2@hjp.at> - 2012-07-08 12:15 +0200
                Re: Java processors Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-07-07 21:17 -0700
          Re: Java processors Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2012-07-05 19:14 -0600
        Re: Java processors Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-07-06 13:34 -0700
          Re: Java processors Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2012-07-06 23:04 +0200
            Re: Java processors Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2012-07-07 00:13 +0200
              Re: Java processors Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-07-06 19:16 -0700
                Re: Java processors "Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-usenet2@hjp.at> - 2012-07-08 11:37 +0200
      Re: Java processors Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-07-06 13:24 -0700
        Re: Java processors BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-07-07 10:06 -0500
  Re: Java processors Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-07-06 05:22 -0700

csiph-web