Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Hydrangea Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: I need a different approach - suggestions please Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 22:28:23 -0400 Organization: Your flower bed Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <1p8ku7t6niu12h4amqpacvqvd9nv659opq@4ax.com> <038a5966-8619-470d-9a65-c15f214c5a0f@googlegroups.com> <53hku7dsa5dqi7nru47qemqg75hnuuv7bs@4ax.com> <4fea6d75$0$293$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <63uku71ckap2t9ekhq8e7l10sp08q56tn0@4ax.com> <4febb350$0$289$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <2efnu7lk91o43tcm9spk8b9p9u97vi0ggo@4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: BHpp6j/wDTs8dVrHeRWgdw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: NewsTap/3.5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:15705 On 27/06/2012 10:14 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 21:28:48 -0400, Arne Vajhøj > wrote: > > [snip] > >> But since the rest of the world does not then that is a bad >> choice. > > Or I am on the bleeding edge. > > At one point, presumably only one person (or only a few) was > using the Java coding conventions so highly touted here. Therefore, > by your argument, said conventions were a bad choice. "...therefore, all progress depends upon the unreasonable man". :)