Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Fred Greer Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: ImageIO/BufferedImage behaving inconsistently from one day to the next. Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 02:31:00 +0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 113 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 02:31:00 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="VCVQ51H5cIpUVjyIeCvePw"; logging-data="15551"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18EiWSDXfKzUL3Fk1T+LWgcecaz6LYgqXQ=" X-Mailer: MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4 Cancel-Lock: sha1:bR7wTeDp7/2RzObverV3L3jmeFo= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:15440 I have code that used to work perfectly, which processes images in certain ways, and today it suddenly was not working. I hadn't changed the code at all. I tracked the problem down to spurious IllegalArgumentExceptions being thrown by this code: public class ImageUtils { private static float[] BLUR = {0.1111111, 0.1111111, 0.1111111, 0.1111111, 0.1111111, 0.1111111, 0.1111111, 0.1111111, 0.1111111} ... public static BufferedImage blur (BufferedImage img) { Kernel k = new Kernel(3, 3, BLUR); ConvolveOp co = new ConvolveOp(k, ConvolveOp.EDGE_NO_OP, null); BufferedImage dest = new BufferedImage(img.getWidth(), img.getHeight(),img.getType()); co.filter(img,dest); return dest; } ... } This code worked yesterday and fails today with java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unknown image type 0 and a stack trace pointing to the line creating dest. I did some fiddling, and when loading any PNG image with ImageIO.read, the result (after being fed through something that uses reflection to try to identify bean-like properties in order to "inspect" an object; one of my debugging tools) is this: java.awt.image.BufferedImage: type = 0 ColorModel: #pixelBits = 32 numComponents = 4 color space = java.awt.color.ICC_ColorSpace@1bffd0d transparency = 3 has alpha = true isAlphaPre = false ByteInterleavedRaster: width = 2560 height = 1440 #numDataElements 4 dataOff[0] = 0 According to the Javadocs, a type of 0 represents "Custom". There are only two conclusions to draw from this: 1. Overnight, BufferedImage suddenly stopped accepting a type of 0, or 2. Overnight, ImageIO.read suddenly started setting the image type to 0 instead of something more specific like TYPE_INT_ARGB when loading and decoding PNGs. Neither of these makes much sense, because standard library code is not supposed to magically change its behavior like that, and it's certainly not supposed to make something that used to work no longer work by magically changing its behavior overnight. Now, when I first wrote the blur method it had had BufferedImage dest = co.createCompatibleDestImage(img, img.getColorModel()); instead. The result had been a blank black image output from ImageUtils.blur(foo) no matter what the input looked like. I've now tried that again, and suddenly it works. So, literally overnight and without apparent provocation, new BufferedImage(img.getWidth(),img.getHeight(),img.getType()) magically started throwing exceptions when it used to work with the exact same disk file loaded into img in the exact same way, and at the same time, co.createCompatibleDestImage(img,img.getColorModel()); magically started *working* when it had previously created destination images that didn't actually work with the ConvolveOp in question, despite the obvious contract of the method named "createCompatibleDestImage". Can anyone explain these occurrences? Furthermore, can anyone suggest an implementation of blur that is guaranteed not only to work, but to stay working in perpetuity and not magically stop working some day? What if the version of blur using createCompatibleDestImage suddenly goes back to producing blank images? I can restore the other version of the code. Or I can even write try { ; Blur implementation using constructor and .getType goes here } catch (IllegalArgumentException x) { ; Blur implementation using createCompatibleDestImage goes here } and this will presumably work even if it randomly toggles between the two observed patterns of behavior every Tuesday and alternate Thursday, though it'll be an evil, ugly hack. But what if it suddenly jumps to some *third* state where *neither* implementation of blur works and I have to try something completely new? And what if it changes to something unprecedented again after that, and again, and every week forever? Logically, that shouldn't be possible. But by the same logic *what I've already observed* shouldn't be possible, so obviously that logic is suspect and I can no longer assume that blur needing a completely novel implementation every week, or every day, or even every hour cannot happen. Doctors needing completently novel antibiotics to treat staph infections not only can but has happened, and happened repeatedly, after all, so if something in the JVM has started "evolving resistance" to blurring images successfully, for some reason, then the same thing could happen there. So, is there something that is evolving or changing under the hood in how ImageIO/AWT operates? And if so, are there any rock-stable guarantees regarding the API behavior that I can rely on to implement a blur method that will never fail for any valid input image? I'd have thought, from reading the javadocs for it, that createCompatibleDestImage was it, but that's already been disproved...