Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: markspace <-@.>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: JavaFX native deployment
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:00:33 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <jrft82$u3$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:00:34 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="IZQsHU8CwMUPnWgvh4wwWA"; logging-data="963"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX186XxvZr441TjG5VLm8ystSzkONSGj+/Es="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Gt1tH4WtxSO8sptNQeAHiD+rLgM=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:15305

We had a discussion a while back where I opined that Java applets had 
some work to do for deployment options.  Here's some new stuff for 
JavaFX:  native deployments.

<https://blogs.oracle.com/talkingjavadeployment/entry/native_packaging_for_javafx>

I think this lends some support to my previous point.  That is, Oracle 
wouldn't be fancying up their deployment options if the previous options 
were not lacking.