Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: Proposed new Java feature
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 18:53:50 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <jq3ujm$2bf$1@dont-email.me>
References: <jprnu7$uv8$1@dont-email.me> <jptkmp$vbg$1@dont-email.me> <jptq42$1jo$1@dont-email.me> <8Euwr.47425$On2.20024@newsfe16.iad> <jpttrh$nqe$1@dont-email.me> <jptvdf$1s5$1@dont-email.me> <jpu11t$c79$1@dont-email.me> <jpu7m3$k7e$1@dont-email.me> <jpu9aj$t3p$1@dont-email.me> <a2h1djFoq2U2@mid.individual.net> <jq05ij$kt9$1@dont-email.me> <a2hqv5F695U1@mid.individual.net> <jq0iuo$cq6$1@dont-email.me> <a2i77nFik2U1@mid.individual.net> <jq1jvi$m5i$1@dont-email.me> <a2kr84F7kbU1@mid.individual.net>
Injection-Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 01:53:58 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="AXjbjGvakNxR7/6Xyznwww"; logging-data="2415"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/frdGeugBr623J5vwOuPXerpJdymd0DB0="
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+LrVkuy7YhnbXrurmMivxOUUzDk=
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:14930


"Robert Klemme" <shortcutter@googlemail.com> wrote in message 
news:a2kr84F7kbU1@mid.individual.net...
> On 05/29/2012 06:40 AM, Mike Schilling wrote:
>> "Robert Klemme"<shortcutter@googlemail.com>  wrote in message
>> news:a2i77nFik2U1@mid.individual.net...
>>> The point is that with the global reference cleanup the specific code 
>>> does
>>> not have a chance to run because it does not know when.  The proper 
>>> point
>>> in time is just before or during remove().
>>
>> How would the cleanup code knew when to run during Thread exit?
>
> Obviously that would have to be implemented in class Thread using a 
> finally block.

Do the same with Threads returned to ThreadPools and we're good.