Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lew Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.lang.javascript Subject: Re: Chrome bug with Applet and threading Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 07:02:46 -0700 Organization: albasani.net Lines: 60 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.albasani.net QFFz3xVSDpnZweFTF8IA48ZYJ1rtTvw0S8CMcnMuUY77ukEO108uZPPLLSB/HjZNznWZ/q/oo1PFGubLHUIuBCUpa1RvACOCjTR524ysPE2r/MOoeVDQj62x+29+H02w NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 14:02:26 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: news.albasani.net; logging-data="H2w9St/IETjVx50i9i+3S6s7vMIr8tObmacn/6kkoHGQUz+LrdkmG/0wd+62MG4Q0j/tKnGbosHabQr5fEMq3VJ5I6IIQnjXaFZvjLKAiDEimQ0CpZ+X9LQ/EYFKhXDM"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ky3l9/TNOzXFPW/DC9YzqbKnHVU= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:14883 comp.lang.javascript:14204 On 05/29/2012 05:17 AM, Richard Maher wrote: > "Evertjan." wrote in message > news:XnsA05E5D966C1D2eejj99@194.109.133.133... >> Richard Maher wrote on 25 mei 2012 in comp.lang.javascript: >>> Please see Chrome bug report: - >>> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=129528 >>> >>> If you can identify a bug in my code that is causing the hang on >>> Chrome them please let me know. Otherwise please vote for this issue >>> by ticking the star. SSCCE provided and behaviour very easy to >>> reproduce. >> >> Off topic, Java != Javascript. > > Can you please explain why you are so adamant that all of the Javascript on > the readily available: - > http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/attachmentText?id=129528&aid=1295280000000&name=hydra.html&token=uG9gNfEjUC8sTqGvGvrDTjpYD1E%3A1338292470931 > is not responsible for the hang with the Chrome browser? You are asking the respondent why they are "so adamant" about a claim they've never made. That is a logical fallacy and rhetorical dirty trick known as the "straw man" argument. > Perhaps the "dispatcher" method gets an exception and prevents the Applet > callback from calling notifyAll()? But that would surely only block one TAB? > > Regardless, my decision to alter the Javascript so that the user's > "callback" JS function no longer has to call a "rendezvous" method but > rather return a true/false indicating end-of-stream for a reply/result-set > culminated in a solution that now works with every browser except Chrome. > Maybe a further tweak to the Javascript/DOM could get Chrome to obey the > rules? (Certainly appending the DIV child to the document.body *before* > seting its innerHTML got IE8 over the line with Applet activation!) > > Anyway, underneath all this is a single Java thread multiplexing output to > any number of TABs in a browser instance that constitute an Application, and > I think a lot of people would find that very interesting! Having said that, > to date, nobody could be bothered to tick a simple star so maybe no one > cares? What? What star? What are you talking about? What does that have to do with Java or Javascript? That comment seems so random and non-sequiturish. And why are you so aggrieved about whatever a "simple star" is? >> -- >> Evertjan. >> The Netherlands. > > Oh, I get it! It's just that you can't wait till August when you and your > Cloggie mates get to take your caravans down to the autobahns and really > give complete strangers the shits? And thus you descend into simple trolldom. How is that a helpful remark, "Richard"? -- Lew Honi soit qui mal y pense. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/Friz.jpg