Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Sleepy the Dwarf Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Article: Why you can't dump Java (even though you want to) Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 08:40:48 -0400 Organization: Forestville Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <4fa9c272$0$294$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <4fac5b32$0$288$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: nr+Uh7PidS9bvsHY4jAnIg.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: NewsTap/3.5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:14501 On 12/05/2012 1:30 AM, javax.swing.JSnarker wrote: > On 11/05/2012 12:41 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote: >> wrote: >>> Personally, if someone expects me to spend my time on their website >>> they better provide a compelling reason for me to want to do so, and >>> gratuitous dependence on JS just puts me off. In general I consider it >>> a good early indicator of a terrible web designer: "You need JS to >>> click this link", right so this guy taught himself web design in his >>> own dreams. >> >> Exactly. Except that the JS-to-click design might also be due to >> a gratuitous complexity bug (in the coder). > > I'm convinced that in most cases it's deliberate: punish users who > disable JS and force them to turn it on so they can be harassed with > annoying animated JS-reliant ads and crap. And so they can be tracked!