Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: David Lamb Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Good Fowler article on ORM Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 21:56:39 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 9 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 01:56:50 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="w5ewJxsRgiUymlDHZo0DiA"; logging-data="19854"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/wf9UPi2HOZnQVVHX7d3U4" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:fsmTp2aXIL8meJjmn+sS9p+E8hs= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:14482 On 11/05/2012 4:06 AM, Jan Burse wrote: > I also went for a custom implementation of some of > the Collection classes, to have the algorithms not > use iterators, but inline loops for speed. Isn't > possible with the existing classes since one cannot > access the fields. Isn't that the sort of optimization a JIT compiler is supposed to be able to do?