Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: markspace <-@.> Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Article: Why you can't dump Java (even though you want to) Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 20:52:39 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <4fa9c272$0$294$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 03:52:44 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="zgW2MA4sFrKxp4jMohs6RQ"; logging-data="3158"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19uz2Kk2x/ai0EeAMLtfV2hSJume9LqLSk=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 In-Reply-To: <4fa9c272$0$294$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> Cancel-Lock: sha1:P/IAWeJPamQiMUFGITmIYUkJUdE= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:14441 On 5/8/2012 6:03 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote: > That worked fine 10 years ago. > > In these AJAX times the number of sites working without > JavaScript must be dropping pretty steep. A lot of sites don't work without JavaScript enabled. But many work well enough. It's a matter of playing the odds. The more sites you go to with JavaScript disabled by default, the less likely it is that you'll get some sort of malware from them. Sure I often have to enable JS, but only after I've seen the site first. If it looks dodgy, I just leave. And often I can still click on a few links or read an article without JS. It's rare I'll enable JS if I just need one thing from a site.