Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: glen herrmannsfeldt Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: no more primitive data types in Java (JDK 10+). What do you think? Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 23:48:53 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <31946709.2630.1334888553396.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcsy1> <1kjq7upn72ead.dnfbqpmw22at$.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: H0vc4U5LIRkRHNPyGCs2dA.user.speranza.aioe.org X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: tin/1.9.6-20100522 ("Lochruan") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.32-5-amd64 (x86_64)) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:13776 Lew wrote: (snip) > I stand corrected, in the sense that any number can be used > approximately. > When someone says, "I had twelve phone calls", they might > mean more or less than twelve, but the meaning of the word > "twelve" remains precise. > No one I've heard of before you denied that "dozen" means > twelve, even when used approximately like any other number. OK, but how many is "dozens?" Is it only integer multiples of 12, or other multiples? -- glen