Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: markspace <-@.> Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: please coin a term for a lower order bug Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:38:41 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <9f3jns8095wj.2ln3sbv2qk$.dlg@40tude.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 21:38:43 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="XjIWM99mD7Ijfdu600oVPA"; logging-data="27928"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19atIHwYMSgUzJIYYMEzEEd+Xb3cU3ZmjY=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:poTMv8jvVdXG/xo+LtA2ZUpJVJc= Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:11189 On 1/10/2012 1:00 PM, David Lamb wrote: > I no longer have the reference at hand, but aeons ago I recall reading a > paper that used basically the same qualifiers as Peter but applied them > to the word "flaw" instead of "bug;" Other terms might be "issue" (like, "I have an issue with the way this code works), or "undesirable feature." In a bug-base, these are sometimes referred to as RFEs (Request for Enhancement) as opposed to bugs or RFCs (Request for Change).