Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eric Sosman Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: please coin a term for a lower order bug Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:05:59 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <2pboqbqz49.fsf@shell.xmission.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:06:00 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="HSlJAUb3pGXi3i7ZL/HoAw"; logging-data="32439"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+lnI86hNK0PcdW1TV13MsM" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 In-Reply-To: <2pboqbqz49.fsf@shell.xmission.com> Cancel-Lock: sha1:39YDCBFPAaOjtRfBX84RcdanwrM= Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:11186 On 1/10/2012 11:52 AM, Jim Janney wrote: > Roedy Green writes: > >> What would you call a flaw in a program that had no effect on the >> results, but needlessly made the program slower or confusing? > > What about one that makes it more confusing and needlessly faster? That, we call "Progress." -- Eric Sosman esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid