Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: markspace <-@.> Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: please coin a term for a lower order bug Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:51:16 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <2pboqbqz49.fsf@shell.xmission.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:51:20 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="XjIWM99mD7Ijfdu600oVPA"; logging-data="4247"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+OLeHjIZUhphMJEVZ40L/UOcpnB/C3u/w=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 In-Reply-To: <2pboqbqz49.fsf@shell.xmission.com> Cancel-Lock: sha1:r1FjEnNmBrg3Jl1IVLju/DN5DAA= Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:11184 On 1/10/2012 8:52 AM, Jim Janney wrote: > Roedy Green writes: > >> What would you call a flaw in a program that had no effect on the >> results, but needlessly made the program slower or confusing? > > What about one that makes it more confusing and needlessly faster? > "Needlessly faster" as in the customer didn't need a speed improvement in that feature? I'd say that's Gold Plating.