Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: kensi Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: toward null-safe cookie cutter Comparators Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:21:34 -0500 Organization: SICN Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: boE97fIOqjAfikXEhaRruQ.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (CYGWIN_NT-6.0/1.5.22(0.156/4/2) (i686)) Hamster/2.0.2.2 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:10024 On 16/11/2011 4:47 PM, Daniel Pitts wrote: > On 11/16/11 9:50 AM, kensi wrote: >> Comment above is wrong, should be >> // Commonly used Law of Demeter violation >> HTH. :) > > Perhaps in this case, but the point still stands that null propagation > can make bug diagnosis much more difficult. I agree about your larger point.