Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: Java 8 Lambda binary snapshot
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:05:58 -0700
Organization: albasani.net
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <ja3eub$qir$1@news.albasani.net>
References: <j9k23f$u03$1@dont-email.me> <2244638.2045.1321057203472.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prep8> <j9kf5g$ldr$1@dont-email.me> <u_rvq.24671$Us1.13168@newsfe16.iad> <4ebe8090$0$288$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <7580854.318.1321121258309.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prlm15> <F06wq.37583$0s1.33690@newsfe11.iad> <7958763.239.1321281909576.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prou19> <4ec31323$0$294$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <15937048.530.1321424926867.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prap37> <ja0i80$rnm$1@news.albasani.net> <ja0ta0$kms$2@speranza.aioe.org> <ja0utk$pqk$1@speranza.aioe.org> <ja19s9$jo1$1@news.albasani.net> <18774852.57.1321481098884.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prap37>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.albasani.net URe7ICuK0No2+8J5GciXuTfFFIxVf16HDzcGmjbAVkSuogD1KBKWW9pBv+qOuEL3ZfBtJ8Jv2u5jNTtszvmpXHjx+zbT81/gWD36sVW2aw/CCUdt0JCZtL/7uzrJ5RJp
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:06:20 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.albasani.net; logging-data="5N8/yUv/9j4tCaJbhg2+Urpk8H5Tcfzly93d9/httK4SYA0VJ3pu/lcmf1tnBP3Qwp8ht+KP93WZ8eCwMruqDGBSU+5vskYem3casdJ1e3FZI5M1qH67EvWDXqmZ0vsp"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
In-Reply-To: <18774852.57.1321481098884.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prap37>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xuiCxfvvmGPtwWBq2k7NqIUS5lQ=
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:10005

On 11/16/2011 3:04 PM, Lew wrote:
> BGB wrote:
>> generally, C is more stable than my own BGBScript language though,
>
> I'm sure that's fascinating for all those BGBScript users out there.
>
> How does this cast insight into Java programming again?
>

because the statement they were poking at was in the context of C as 
more reliable than BGBScript, not as more reliable than Java.

granted, me and sticking on any particular topic is not a strong area...