Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #2838
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!feeder.news-service.com!216.196.110.144.MISMATCH!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.telenor.com!news.telenor.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Mon, 04 Apr 2011 02:34:30 -0500 |
| From | Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> |
| Subject | Re: regex capability |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| References | <u3sip61i207oesd83ckbrt3vjm66p948kd@4ax.com> |
| User-Agent | tin/1.9.6-20100522 ("Lochruan") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.35-28-generic-pae (i686)) |
| Message-ID | <jYqdnTTVm5ob6QTQnZ2dnUVZ87-dnZ2d@telenor.com> (permalink) |
| Date | Mon, 04 Apr 2011 02:34:30 -0500 |
| Lines | 19 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| X-Trace | sv3-c9uLCrfEbJt48eQ4B/tIw1j7S3S5Gf5nBMCyt4vJ8rzKg+ngG0eaHz5suwDJLkoZkwI/DsLvNKEO50D!ysm+0Dk5UE/mhyjFu3o4wkN4XGD2dRs/hleMOMf8tMTKC5CE5VPf9caxDEA4Y0k+4fZbIX8z7pzx!nh14OiMi |
| X-Complaints-To | news-abuse@telenor.net |
| X-DMCA-Complaints-To | news-abuse@telenor.net |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 1693 |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:2838 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote: > Consider a string like this: > > Support DDR2 1066/800/667/533/400 DDR2 SDRAM > > Is it possible to compose a regex that will peel out those numbers for > you each in its own field, or do you have to extract the string > "1066/800/667/533/400" and use split? > > The various things I have tried just grab the last number. Easiest is to just use split. You can always do a regex of the type "(\\d+)/((\\d+)/)?((\\d+)/)?((\\d+)/)?" but that's just pointlessly complicated. There's no reason why you should use a regex when "normal" string parsing is simpler and easier to read. -- Leif Roar Moldskred
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
regex capability Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-04-04 00:19 -0700
Re: regex capability Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2011-04-04 02:34 -0500
Re: regex capability Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-04-04 00:50 -0700
Re: regex capability Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-04-04 08:03 -0400
Re: regex capability Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-04-04 05:25 -0700
Re: regex capability David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2011-04-04 18:51 -0400
Re: regex capability Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> - 2011-04-04 17:07 -0700
Re: regex capability bugbear <bugbear@trim_papermule.co.uk_trim> - 2011-04-04 09:26 +0100
Re: regex capability Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-04-04 19:20 +0200
Re: regex capability Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-04 22:13 +0200
Re: regex capability markspace <-@.> - 2011-04-04 18:35 -0700
Re: regex capability bugbear <bugbear@trim_papermule.co.uk_trim> - 2011-04-05 09:09 +0100
Re: regex capability Paul Cager <paul.cager@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-05 02:10 -0700
Re: regex capability Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-04-05 05:28 -0700
Re: regex capability Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-05 06:33 -0700
Re: regex capability markspace <-@.> - 2011-04-05 10:07 -0700
csiph-web