Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #8470

Re: Avoid creating a stacktrace prior to JDK 1.7

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Avoid creating a stacktrace prior to JDK 1.7
Date Sun, 02 Oct 2011 02:04:42 +0200
Organization albasani.net
Lines 37
Message-ID <j689qr$6l1$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink)
References <j64ht6$o64$1@news.albasani.net> <j66puk$h0j$1@dont-email.me> <j66t6a$9ta$1@news.albasani.net> <4424828.699.1317485416810.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prng5> <j67kk4$qf3$1@news.albasani.net> <1058576.2212.1317496868028.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prfh23> <j67rp6$afo$1@news.albasani.net> <j67svg$7om$1@dont-email.me> <j682df$9ve$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace news.albasani.net 2q7vOZS947wVLyTTfPyUSJuFbtx1RTLFRqfT91KjvnbrmiBbw7ukOau/ZUbspfyyuV5AvGTR1qcA2h7ZG+94dA==
NNTP-Posting-Date Sun, 2 Oct 2011 00:04:43 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info news.albasani.net; logging-data="d5etEVJHKvamnFpPgqclPoLeyuLyF7MG2jUYI5GbOwgnlqmaoWGJ7T7aubE8Yz5mJzcwhfCpTp1N1Yl8/Gwirhm2QxirbDKkwg6HIXdxjeFtVMT82KpEmGlcp/7x6/vL"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net"
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110928 Firefox/7.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.4.1
In-Reply-To <j682df$9ve$1@dont-email.me>
Cancel-Lock sha1:LeOdEvKC1s4VjuhdJd5l9tkQMxI=
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:8470

Show key headers only | View raw


Stanimir Stamenkov schrieb:
> quite wrong!). Virtual machines are allowed to do extensive
> | optimizations when JITing and may entirely remove stack frames,
> | making it impossible to reliably locate the calling class and
> | method.
>
> So it seems stack trace information is not guaranteed to be available to
> user code.  This detail may be given somewhere in the language or VM
> specifications.

Yes, you usually don't get a stack overflow
when you do tail recursion for example. So
a method:

     void p(int a) {

         ...
         p(b);
     }

Is the same as a loop:

     void p(int a) {
        for (;;) {
           ...
           a = b;
        }
     }

The simplest obtimisation a JIT can do is replace
the last call p(b) by a jump, so not pushing a
new return address on the stack and reusing the
already pushed return address.

Etc... Etc...

Bye

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Avoid creating a stacktrace prior to JDK 1.7 Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-09-30 15:57 +0200
  Re: Avoid creating a stacktrace prior to JDK 1.7 Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> - 2011-10-01 13:27 +0300
    Re: Avoid creating a stacktrace prior to JDK 1.7 Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-10-01 13:22 +0200
      Re: Avoid creating a stacktrace prior to JDK 1.7 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-10-01 09:10 -0700
        Re: Avoid creating a stacktrace prior to JDK 1.7 Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> - 2011-10-01 20:31 +0300
        Re: Avoid creating a stacktrace prior to JDK 1.7 Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-10-01 20:02 +0200
          Re: Avoid creating a stacktrace prior to JDK 1.7 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-10-01 12:21 -0700
            Re: Avoid creating a stacktrace prior to JDK 1.7 Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-10-01 22:04 +0200
              Re: Avoid creating a stacktrace prior to JDK 1.7 Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-10-01 16:24 -0400
                Re: Avoid creating a stacktrace prior to JDK 1.7 Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-10-01 23:14 +0200
                Re: Avoid creating a stacktrace prior to JDK 1.7 Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-10-01 17:28 -0400
                Re: Avoid creating a stacktrace prior to JDK 1.7 Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-10-01 23:45 +0000
                Re: Avoid creating a stacktrace prior to JDK 1.7 Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> - 2011-10-02 00:58 +0300
                Re: Avoid creating a stacktrace prior to JDK 1.7 Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-10-02 02:04 +0200
                Re: Avoid creating a stacktrace prior to JDK 1.7 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-10-01 20:06 -0700
                Re: Avoid creating a stacktrace prior to JDK 1.7 Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> - 2011-10-02 13:14 +0300
                Re: Avoid creating a stacktrace prior to JDK 1.7 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-10-02 08:37 -0700
                Re: Avoid creating a stacktrace prior to JDK 1.7 Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-10-02 20:26 +0200
                Re: Avoid creating a stacktrace prior to JDK 1.7 Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-10-02 17:51 -0400
                Re: Avoid creating a stacktrace prior to JDK 1.7 Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-10-03 01:32 +0200
    Re: Avoid creating a stacktrace prior to JDK 1.7 Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> - 2011-10-01 20:19 +0300
      Re: Avoid creating a stacktrace prior to JDK 1.7 Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-10-01 20:04 +0200
        Re: Avoid creating a stacktrace prior to JDK 1.7 Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> - 2011-10-01 21:15 +0300

csiph-web