Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: Bulk Array Element Allocation, is it faster?
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 23:50:44 +0200
Organization: albasani.net
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <j5o7nl$5b8$1@news.albasani.net>
References: <j5lvf0$bhl$1@news.albasani.net> <ke2t77p38ktjf6bi8fvng7mo0a2a0cad8e@4ax.com> <j5mpq6$lra$1@news.albasani.net> <j5n5jo$r2r$1@dont-email.me> <j5nnv6$t23$1@news.albasani.net> <31815149.2253.1316975280430.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prfp13> <j5nv6v$h44$1@news.albasani.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.albasani.net 5EHExBxWdJs+99so9Ur6iWOXA0v3RQ9DSNcNCZGcc+SUCvB0r/ZjiMboO6dPTgu45Mfdhfn558uBD/TSxYSO8A==
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 21:50:45 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.albasani.net; logging-data="s3a/5ohVKvxQsqWyhNfG7pqzDa7UMly+h7iZ6hKYAD3HsXeiu6S0xQiW97e3SM8aQPkwL6DwMdL8WES5ISuarulPGXHmfyD3j0BXj6MO2AWlAvIlv6/XPZGOFZOAZ2tu"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Firefox/6.0.2 SeaMonkey/2.3.3
In-Reply-To: <j5nv6v$h44$1@news.albasani.net>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:gZxyNK/XlUVCJ5suNkSdcDXg4cY=
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:8314

Jan Burse schrieb:
>
> OS    JDK    Arch    Bulk    Lazy    Delta %
> Win     1.6     64bit    8'771    9'805    11.8%
> Win     1.6     32bit    14'587    14'744    1.1%
> Win    1.5     32bit    17'139    17'405    1.6%
> Mac    1.6    64bit    11'003    12'363    12.4%
> Unix    1.6    32bit    26'517    26'858    1.3%

Update:

Win	1.7	64bit	8'159	8'975	10.0%

Same machine like 1.6 64bit testing was done,
just another JDK, the newer 1.7. Advantage of
bulk over lazy slightly less pronounced.

But application itself 10% faster again (sic!).

Bye