Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: thoolen Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Is there a file limit size of 2GB in JDK 1.5 Followup-To: comp.os.os2.advocacy Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 05:51:26 -0400 Organization: thingamajig Lines: 80 Message-ID: References: <4e77f588$0$314$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <4e7a8087$0$281$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <4e7b2689$0$12007$c3e8da3$e3f2c276@news.astraweb.com> <17543098.889.1316706469246.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prdy8> <4e7bab38$0$11983$c3e8da3$e3f2c276@news.astraweb.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: dfnsu02TyBG8FRBIc0q24w.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: WinVN 0.99.12z (x86 32bit) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:8232 On 22/09/2011 5:40 PM, "Jane Doe", an obvious murphy sock, wrote: NaN> Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer NaN> I can appreciate your point. What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do with Java, murphy? You have never shown any capacity for "appreciating" any "point" involving your messages being off-topic or in other ways unwelcome or violating of social norms, murphy, as evidenced by the slimy trail of gigabytes of off-topic paranoid blather, punctuated by occasional flamewars, that you have left all over Usenet like some giant radiation-mutated snail. NaN> However from what I have witnessed first hand you (particularly) NaN> are not mature enough in the Usenet sense to apply that same advice NaN> to the posts Derbyshire leads you "up the garden path" with. Who is "Derbyshire", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias. NaN> Even when you *know* his posts contains factual mistakes you NaN> grant the post credibility by an exchange which implies the NaN> disagreement is up for discussion. How ironic, seeing as your posts contain numerous factual mistakes, expressed and implied. NaN> You ignore the other choice. NaN> Tell him to fuck off. Or ignore the post. How ironic, coming from someone who seems to be incapable himself of ignoring the same posts. NaN> That's "maturity" in dealing with the Usenet child. Who is "the Usenet child", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias. NaN> Like, how many times is it required to *show* Derbyshire NaN> is running multiple names in cljp? Who is "Derbyshire", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias. NaN> Programmers are that dense? It isn't a sign of density when someone disbelieves or disregards you, murphy. In fact, it is a sign of density when someone listens to you and takes what you said seriously, murphy. NaN> Or just you? What does your question of Bloch have to do with Java, murphy? "I had 'volunteered (years back) to support those who do endeavor to provide free Free Usenet access, support those who offered subscription based Free Usenet access, nothing more than cooperation expected in return for what has been many thousands of hours of work. I note most of those I joined with are either deceased, severely disabled, or plain ole' MIA.. now it is my Time. ... You just read my last. ... For those who think they see me in future times I can only wish you severe Tinnitus in your dreams. For those who know me well (eMail, whatever) and see me, know I will be smiling also. It is to you I say "adieu mein frenz and adios .. grazie' [hugs] for all the Good Times! May you and yours always bear well with all Life brings you". /0ut" --murphy http://www.uffnet.com/kookkamp/goodbye.htm And people wonder why I call them Famous Last Words. P.S. You forgot to include a copy of your famous paranoid "Lits o' Haet" in your post, murphy. Still suffering from memory problems, murphy?