Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #7613
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!feeder.news-service.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | "Nasser M. Abbasi" <nma@12000.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: which JDK to use? |
| Date | Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:59:24 -0700 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Lines | 25 |
| Message-ID | <j44ju1$qb2$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <e6fcc7a3-b35e-4176-9062-f491de144749@u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com> <t84a671bje7ah3ts9e59nkon2pnmgb5oq0@4ax.com> <f8392400-a0b3-41f0-9cba-fe7d87900a21@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com> |
| Reply-To | nma@12000.org |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 4IuMaYl5j9Y5F74I990LJw.user.speranza.aioe.org |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@aioe.org |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/6.0.1 |
| X-Notice | Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:7613 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 9/5/2011 1:16 PM, Lew wrote: > > To Qu0ll's point that Oracle's JDK 7 is OpenJDK, that's 99% true. > There are pieces you can purchase that supplement the open-source part, > such as the soft real-time version, that are not in OpenJDK. I was unable to > confirm that the current Oracle release is precisely the same as OpenJDK, > but it's clear that the differences, if any, are in the corners. > on related point: http://lxnews.org/2011/09/05/oracle-stops-shipping-java/ "September 5, 2011" "Oracle has decided to stop shipping its proprietary Java packages for Linux, telling everyone to move to OpenJDK instead." " Oracle has retired the “Operating System Distributor License for Java” (DLJ) that was created by Sun in 2006" "the need for Oracle’s Java implementation has steadily decreased since the release of the OpenJDK 6, adding that the OpenJDK is proven and mature and is the chosen package of most Linux distributors." --Nasser
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
which JDK to use? steveh44 <steve_h44@yahoo.com> - 2011-09-04 07:17 -0700
Re: which JDK to use? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-09-04 11:00 -0400
Re: which JDK to use? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-09-04 12:10 -0700
Re: which JDK to use? "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-09-06 05:31 +1000
Re: which JDK to use? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-09-05 16:35 -0400
Re: which JDK to use? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-09-05 11:13 -0700
Re: which JDK to use? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-09-05 13:16 -0700
Re: which JDK to use? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-09-05 15:56 -0700
Re: which JDK to use? Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2011-09-05 20:15 -0400
Re: which JDK to use? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-09-05 17:39 -0700
Re: which JDK to use? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-09-06 15:31 +0100
Re: which JDK to use? "Nasser M. Abbasi" <nma@12000.org> - 2011-09-06 00:59 -0700
csiph-web