Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #7585

Re: StringBuilder

Show all headers | View raw

Roedy Green schrieb:
> No. Java has so such syntactic sugar. However, the IntelliJ IDE will
> convert from + notation to sb.append notation.

Maybe the IDE provides something similar. Basically I have seeing
the IDE mock about the following:

    buf.append(x+y);

It then suggests to use:

    buf.append(x);
    buf.append(y);

And it also mocks about the following:

    StringBuffer buf=new StringBuffer();

It then suggests to use:

    StringBuilder buf=new StringBuilder();

But that + is internally realized via StringBuilder is a property
of javac with target >= 1.5 and not of the IDE.

See for example:
http://caprazzi.net/posts/java-bytecode-string-concatenation-and-stringbuilder/

Bye

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

StringBuilder bob <bob@coolgroups.com> - 2011-09-04 19:45 -0700
  Re: StringBuilder Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-09-04 22:53 -0400
  Re: StringBuilder Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-09-05 05:27 +0200
    Re: StringBuilder Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-09-05 19:34 -0400
      Re: StringBuilder Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2011-09-11 16:35 +0200
        Re: StringBuilder Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-09-11 16:48 -0400
    Re: StringBuilder Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-09-05 17:01 -0700
  Re: StringBuilder Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-09-05 11:08 -0700
    Re: StringBuilder Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-09-05 23:54 +0200
      Re: StringBuilder Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-09-06 00:06 +0200
      Re: StringBuilder Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-09-05 17:03 -0700
        Re: StringBuilder Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-09-06 08:53 +0200

csiph-web