Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Joshua Cranmer Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: setSize ArrayList, when will it come? Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:43:33 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: <9aetckFmvmU1@mid.individual.net> <9aftbqFa9kU1@mid.individual.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 02:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="B3q1fNdvNsCxx/IZ4idKGA"; logging-data="29458"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Q2nlSAXw2kieXWCXtZZk+UGJbSFaN27E=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:3KjryDHXhUe1+2hUzuYgz23XFSY= Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:7007 On 8/10/2011 6:52 PM, Jan Burse wrote: > So the chances are very high, that an emulation eats up > exactly these 5-20% percents. I honestly doubt that. But instead of arguing about it, why not *try* implementing it and measuring the performance implications to verify for certain? -- Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. -- Donald E. Knuth