Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: markspace <-@.> Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: higher precision doubles Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2011 15:43:53 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 38 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2011 22:44:00 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="XjIWM99mD7Ijfdu600oVPA"; logging-data="6188"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+bUUBf4XDri3nqQdRoJWlxE+uxt/6ybmQ=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:1+HU+j26Q1KrFWRFmX6XWUnJDpU= Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:6835 On 8/6/2011 2:20 PM, Jan Burse wrote: > So if you add x == 0 to your solution, you would get: > > > -0.000000, false > > -0.000000, false "x == 0" is kind of a known rube-ism. You can't compare floating point directly with any scalar, it just doesn't work. You have to implement some sort of range check. It is a bit of a bummer that Java doesn't provide such a method by default, but it's also not hard to implement. public class FpPrint { public static void main( String[] args ) { System.out.printf( "%6.6f\n", Math.sin( Math.PI * 2 ) ); System.out.printf( "%6.6f\n", StrictMath.sin( StrictMath.PI * 2 ) ); DoubleComparator c = new DoubleComparator( 0.000001 ); System.out.println( c.compare( StrictMath.sin( StrictMath.PI * 2 ), 0.0 ) ); } } class DoubleComparator { private final double constraint; public DoubleComparator( double constraint ) { this.constraint = constraint; } public boolean compare( double d1, double d2 ) { return Math.abs(d1-d2) < constraint; } }