Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jan Burse Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: higher precision doubles Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2011 13:03:22 +0200 Organization: albasani.net Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.albasani.net jvlhdBXlEqvuiiXJDkzqaTdL2kQPRMlbFOqt2dIw+IasWmbOnDzyovsFRJD8etjn+TMMJ8Efbo6bOZntVbpr1g== NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2011 11:03:25 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: news.albasani.net; logging-data="VWv4z9pQ6x/TDwi2g+vtKLjL8UsUdV9DCDmAWy2yPP0ZyvOC6GP+Jy0RFIg/wc0FDfDjVHzHX01N8muQ7vVmtNoeho70h/lGalNKEHsnKtmEIwy/ECjHkC6lcblgE4Jn"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110706 Firefox/5.0 SeaMonkey/2.2 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:o/h5Xqf3VXBp9ovQufbT+W+0iT8= Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:6824 Patricia Shanahan schrieb: > to do so. Even without strictfp, the mantissa sizes and therefore the > precision are fixed. > I was thinking about double extended, where the precision does not stay fixed but is increased. http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_754#Zahlenformate_und_andere_Festlegungen_des_IEEE-754-Standards Double extended has in minimum 79 bit whereby 63 bit are mantissa and 15 bit are exponent. I was wondering whether I can take advantage of an AMD64. Since it has 80bit IEEE floating point registers: http://people.freebsd.org/~lstewart/references/amd64.pdf Paragraph 1.2