Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: markspace <-@.> Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 14:36:55 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <8djj37pg6o35jb1b8lskefb4jmb2iadmbe@4ax.com> <4e3a5a4c$0$2527$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk> <9a04aaFp76U1@mid.individual.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 21:37:00 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="XjIWM99mD7Ijfdu600oVPA"; logging-data="13554"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/9Z5QVIyuzW1NKS+qKfNEuuRXw145Tk3s=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:JiZBOAWpRRByVwETGH6cvua5cuE= Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:6797 On 8/4/2011 1:58 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > On 8/4/2011 11:27 AM, markspace wrote: >> On 8/4/2011 10:47 AM, Chris Riesbeck wrote: >>> In C++, an >>> overloaded postfix ++ >>> >> See? This is why I'm against any kind of operator overloading in Java. >> Too much stupid out there. > > So what operator should have been used for String concatenation, instead > of overloading "+"? I think the obvious interpretation of my comment should be "user defined operator overloading."