Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!usenet.ukfsn.org!not-for-mail From: Martin Gregorie Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: JavaMail bug? Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 09:50:41 +0000 (UTC) Organization: UK Free Software Network Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 84.45.235.129 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: localhost.localdomain 1311501041 8760 84.45.235.129 (24 Jul 2011 09:50:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@localhost.localdomain NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 09:50:41 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:6500 On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 20:54:31 -0700, Knute Johnson wrote: > The last time I used JavaMail I set it up differently with properties > and MimeMessages so I didn't use quite the same method as you did to > send. That's one of the problems with JM, you can get at the problem > from about 50 different ways. If you want to write a little simple test > program, I'll try it here. I've got mail servers I can test it on > although I don't have the host names with quite the same organization. > Thanks. I'll put together a suitably parameterised test program over the next day few days (it looks like soarable weather in the first half of the week - something that's been all too rare recently to miss for anything). > There wouldn't be MX records on the DNS for zoogz would there? > Yes - I run a local DNS to handle names within my LAN and there is an MX record for zoogz. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org |