Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: markspace <-@.>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: JavaBeans
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 08:15:31 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <j0eoil$vjg$1@dont-email.me>
References: <Java-Beans-20110723141119@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 15:15:33 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="XjIWM99mD7Ijfdu600oVPA"; logging-data="32368"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ZUAce6UUVy4BGUviI7gGMp++ZRxUecQA="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
In-Reply-To: <Java-Beans-20110723141119@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:7hUpAJxyECDei85OtZ2WqYdL9ao=
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:6448

On 7/23/2011 5:18 AM, Stefan Ram wrote:
>
>    Can someone explain, if this is true, why it has failed?


I can't, because I don't think it is true.  The latest EJB spec, for 
example, relies heavily on Java beans.

I suspect we are missing some context here.  Not all Java beans uses 
have worked out.  Is there a link to your source?