Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #5775
| From | markspace <-@.> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Automatic linking of related objects in constructor |
| Date | 2011-06-29 09:17 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <iufj6q$tmv$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <eYKdnUijTfibapfTnZ2dnUVZ_uadnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
On 6/29/2011 2:56 AM, Qu0ll wrote:
> Suppose you have class A which contains a list of objects of class B and
> that the constructor for B takes in a reference to the A object which is
> to include it in said list. Is it safe to make a call to A's method
> addB(B b) in that B constructor passing in "this"? I have heard that
> it's bad practice to "leak" a reference to an object from within its own
> constructor because it may be in an invalid state.
Yes, imo this is correct. It seems that sometimes you have to do it
(constructing Swing components) but in general it's a bad idea.
> If not, how else can I automatically add the B object to the list in A
> without forcing the client programmer to explicitly call addB() given
> that they have already passed in the B as an argument?
I like the factory pattern best here
class A {
private ArrayList<B> list;
private A() {}
/** Factory for constructing new A's */
public static A newInstance( B... bs ) {
A a = new A();
a.list = new ArrayList<B>();
a.list.addAll( bs );
return a;
}
}
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Automatic linking of related objects in constructor "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-06-29 19:56 +1000
Re: Automatic linking of related objects in constructor "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-06-29 19:58 +1000
Re: Automatic linking of related objects in constructor Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-06-29 07:28 -0400
Re: Automatic linking of related objects in constructor Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-06-29 08:29 -0400
Re: Automatic linking of related objects in constructor Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-06-30 22:51 +0100
Re: Automatic linking of related objects in constructor supercalifragilisticexpialadiamaticonormalizeringelimatisticantations <supercalifragilisticexpialadiamaticonormalizeringelimatisticantations@averylongandannoyingdomainname.com> - 2011-06-30 18:23 -0400
Re: Automatic linking of related objects in constructor markspace <-@.> - 2011-06-29 09:17 -0700
Re: Automatic linking of related objects in constructor supercalifragilisticexpialadiamaticonormalizeringelimatisticantations <supercalifragilisticexpialadiamaticonormalizeringelimatisticantations@averylongandannoyingdomainname.com> - 2011-06-29 19:58 -0400
csiph-web