Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: supercalifragilisticexpialadiamaticonormalizeringelimatisticantations Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Why "lock" functionality is introduced for all the objects? Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 01:06:20 -0400 Organization: supercalifragilisticexpialadiamaticonormalizeringelimatisticantations Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: iGmuHcWtyc5pbaBTyNZhJQ.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: WinVN 0.99.12z (x86 32bit) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:5764 On 28/06/2011 4:21 PM, Lew wrote: > On 06/28/2011 02:54 PM, > supercalifragilisticexpialadiamaticonormalizeringelimatisticantations > wrote: >> Oh, geez, even *more* overhead. And let's not forget the array has its >> own >> separate object header and length field! > > Much less than 50% of the object size here is for monitors. Whoosh! Lew misses my point again, by a country mile no less. What a surprise.