Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: Why "lock" functionality is introduced for all the objects?
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 20:43:57 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <iudsh3$6fd$2@dont-email.me>
References: <d0bb9e06-16f0-4282-a37e-47e9ca9630ec@r2g2000vbj.googlegroups.com> <iuce66$2nh$1@news.albasani.net> <iud083$2jr$1@news.onet.pl> <iudelj$d4j$1@news.albasani.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:44:19 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="BrOwaJANne849xlH+KPYjQ"; logging-data="6637"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/boub91ZnSHOP8AyKYYccP"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11
In-Reply-To: <iudelj$d4j$1@news.albasani.net>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:oAox7QPKNbWigxa7LUKvb040efU=
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:5756

On 6/28/2011 4:43 PM, BGB wrote:
> [...]
> they made every object lockable but not every object cloneable, where
> one would think cloning would be generally a higher priority.

	class MySingleton implements Cloneable {
	    // What's wrong with this picture?
	}

-- 
Eric Sosman
esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid