Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: markspace <-@.>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: Why "lock" functionality is introduced for all the objects?
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:20:10 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <iudd1r$1cv$1@dont-email.me>
References: <d0bb9e06-16f0-4282-a37e-47e9ca9630ec@r2g2000vbj.googlegroups.com> <iuce66$2nh$1@news.albasani.net> <iud083$2jr$1@news.onet.pl> <iud1u5$f4r$1@news.albasani.net> <iud4f6$lcm$1@news.onet.pl> <iud5js$nno$1@news.albasani.net> <iud66f$8al$1@speranza.aioe.org> <J5KdnRBP4eYkvZfTnZ2dnUVZ_jqdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <iud80u$ci0$2@speranza.aioe.org> <rYCdnRgQGaQjsZfTnZ2dnUVZ_hydnZ2d@earthlink.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 20:20:11 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="5HSAJfqnDjjLFxXZ6WBWEw"; logging-data="1439"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+/us8EqTm+eC/JR2Twf2tyMfurUjkZsxk="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11
In-Reply-To: <rYCdnRgQGaQjsZfTnZ2dnUVZ_hydnZ2d@earthlink.com>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3myKZyL1l6bl9lxRvnoMp1qRz9Q=
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:5749

On 6/28/2011 12:34 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:

> If, for your purposes, minimal memory use is very important, you may
> want to consider other languages with other trade-offs.


Or rolling your own, via the CharSequence interface, for example.