Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Fuschia, President-Elect of the Bright Purplish-Green Council" Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:48:56 -0400 Organization: IBM Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <81h4075t4gfjglji1n033rb20025ebho68@4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lK61ZN65ILzEKGA7nl6UAQ.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Xnews/2006.08.24 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:5628 On 23/06/2011 10:15 PM, Joshua Cranmer wrote: > On 6/23/2011 1:53 PM, Arved Sandstrom wrote: >> Don't mind me - the last few years I've been questioning dogma. All of >> it. :-) > > For what it's worth, I've spent the past few weeks starting to get > really tricky with python. I think I hit the apex when I realized I was > wanting a macro system in python, only shortly after writing functions > that returned functions. I think "good OO design" got thrown out the > window a while ago, although working in the same space as a bunch of > programming language interns is certainly going to mutate your sense of > good language design dogma. Sounds like what you really want is a Lisp. Might I suggest Clojure?