Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jeff Higgins Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: CLI Java Glitch Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:02:25 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:57:30 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="uZlcKoxCDvYxlcrl0EM5vQ"; logging-data="17058"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/um5XCTgkK4yM7YmaFXnygIGM4ccsGZPY=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:CUgNY8kG3jUJ13bjtfW2CWhF2Qg= Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:5521 On 06/22/2011 06:56 AM, Arved Sandstrom wrote: > On 11-06-21 10:52 PM, Jeff Higgins wrote: >> On 06/20/2011 05:24 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote: >> > That may be so, but it's not unanimous. Another camp, and I'm in it, is > happy to leave things as is. > > Joe Average Computer User doesn't normally open up a terminal or a > command prompt and run Java commands. So this is really a discussion > about making a simple thing easier for _techie_ types. I don't think it > warrants the effort, and in some ways it introduces problems where none > existed before. Simplify the issue for some programmers on some systems; > complicate it for other programmers on other systems. I don't agree. I read the OP as wanting to make a simple thing easier for_Gene Wirchenko_. Others seem to be addressing a request to "fix" the java executable. Maybe Lew is right; we must be precise, precise, precise!