Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!selfless.tophat.at!news.glorb.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news2 From: Michael Wojcik Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Android---Why_Dalvik=3F?= Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 13:39:56 -0400 Organization: Micro Focus Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: p8d510f6be0eee35dd543fdc1e2f1735e470a3404dd5a7b86.newsdawg.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:5214 Stefan Ram wrote: > Michael Wojcik writes: >> LibreOffice: A fork of the OOo code, which does not have a great track >> record. Consider CVE-2010-3450 through -3454, etc. And while those >> CVEs don't list LibreOffice among vulnerable products, the SuSE >> LibreOffice update claims it's vulnerable (see [1]). I suspect the >> relative lack of official vulnerability reports for LibreOffice is >> because they're generally reported against OOo instead. And since LO >> has significant additional features on top of the OOo base, it has a >> lot more room for additional mistakes. > > So, where is my Java Office Suite? Have you checked under the sofa cushions? > 1997 Lotus wrote an Office Suite in Java, but it has been withdrawn. Fascinating, but I am not sure what point you are trying to make. -- Michael Wojcik Micro Focus Rhetoric & Writing, Michigan State University