Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!selfless.tophat.at!news.glorb.com!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!lust.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Managed-Code Bloat Followup-To: comp.lang.java.programmer Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 23:53:46 +1200 Organization: Geek Central Lines: 7 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 118-92-86-36.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Trace: lust.ihug.co.nz 1307447627 24565 118.92.86.36 (7 Jun 2011 11:53:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@ihug.co.nz NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:53:47 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: KNode/4.4.11 Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:5063 In message , BGB wrote: > delete can basically also allow a VM to free stuff early, and thus > potentially improve overall performance. Isn’t that conceding the point that automatic garbage collection saps performance?