Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!lust.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Android?Why Dalvik? Followup-To: comp.lang.java.programmer Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:43:06 +1200 Organization: Geek Central Lines: 33 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 118-92-86-36.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Trace: lust.ihug.co.nz 1307083386 10183 118.92.86.36 (3 Jun 2011 06:43:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@ihug.co.nz NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 06:43:06 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: KNode/4.4.11 Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:4926 In message , Steve Sobol wrote: > In article , Lawrence D'Oliveiro says... > >In message , Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > >> In message , Steve Sobol >> wrote: >> >>> In article , Lawrence D'Oliveiro says... >>>> >>>> In message , Steve Sobol >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Nope. Batch files and shell scripts work just fine, and it's easy >>>>> enough to include one with your app. Or you can create a native >>>>> executable stub. >>>> >>>> Sounds like you?re reinventing the work done by GNU Autoconf, only now >>>> it?s happening on every execution, instead of once at build time. >>> >>> You're right, but if I create an app for someone and give them a file >>> they can execute at the command line, or double-click in the GUI, who >>> the hell cares? >> >> Don’t they also have to download and install Java first? >> >> Most Linux distros' installers install a JVM by default, OS X also > installs a JVM by default, and at least one major PC manufacturer > includes Java on their desktop computers (that'd be the 2nd largest - > Dell - I am not sure about the others). Notable omission from that list...