Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: BGB Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered =?UTF-8?B?4oCcSGVs?= =?UTF-8?B?bG8gV29ybGTigJ0gUHJvZ3JhbSAuLi4=?= Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:47:31 -0700 Organization: albasani.net Lines: 47 Message-ID: References: <9b584a36-f160-4e01-8e2f-ca3f83f17ee4@x10g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <5b0642c5-0634-4b8b-98fc-e9bfcbba1064@b42g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <5ebf790e-1d47-409f-9b00-dc2a890b5bcf@l18g2000yql.googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: news.albasani.net 0fR7zI4ps10JDzVduSBI+0T3dRU/mWfAdSlhyxqE7pqo2nP3x3zi0D7Omz5+oPNxlKrQ/z4efqSmGU62hOF5Dw== NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 04:50:42 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: news.albasani.net; logging-data="ph9VEcETWqM9MMBw5ONKcBFRH3fS/UuuFYbz+B0M8cwSzaK0RF4MlNZWHZiKG85YwiMwWsUYaownbaLoc750azMoOrHQvJSeh8M66eTPfUFka1Njl4W6m2wEEqKZNdph"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:st7TdeI/1S15MD7fhkikODuDuG4= Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:4920 On 6/2/2011 8:10 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > In message<5ebf790e-1d47-409f-9b00- > dc2a890b5bcf@l18g2000yql.googlegroups.com>, Paul Cager wrote: > >> On Jun 2, 1:08 pm, Lawrence D'Oliveiro> central.gen.new_zealand> wrote: >> >>> In message >>> <5b0642c5-0634-4b8b-98fc-e9bfcbba1...@b42g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, Paul >>> >>> Cager wrote: >>>> On Jun 2, 11:42 am, Lawrence D'Oliveiro>>> central.gen.new_zealand> wrote: >>> >>>>> In message >>>>> <9b584a36-f160-4e01-8e2f-ca3f83f17...@x10g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>, >>>>> Paul >>> >>>>> Cager wrote: >>>>>> It looks to be the standard 3-clause BSD license to me - that's a >>>>>> good thing, isn't it? >>> >>>>> It would if the code were worth copyrighting. >>> >>>> You seem to misunderstand the difference between copyright and a >>>> license. >>> >>> What is the licence for? >> >> The license grants us permission to use the code. Without a license we >> could be breaching copyright by redistributing it. > > You mean, the way you could be “breaching copyright” by “redistributing” > your USENET posting containing quotations of my words? possibly, except that the nature of Usenet itself is itself for public communicaton and conversation, and so it would be a little harder to make the case that someone was breaching copyright simply by using the medium for its intended purpose... granted, maybe to be really "proper" in a legal sense, Usenet posters would have to agree to a legal agreement to effectively waive personal copyright ownership over the messages they post on Usenet, with some additional clauses/special cases to deal with all the edge cases, such as when posting a message containing content from a 3rd party, ...