Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!lust.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcm9pZOKAlFdoeQ==?= Dalvik? Followup-To: comp.lang.java.programmer Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 13:54:42 +1200 Organization: Geek Central Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 118-92-86-36.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Trace: lust.ihug.co.nz 1306806882 14033 118.92.86.36 (31 May 2011 01:54:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@ihug.co.nz NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 01:54:42 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: KNode/4.4.7 Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:4783 In message , Nasser M. Abbasi wrote: > The funny thing, is that Java when it came out, was supposed to > solve all these differences by putting a virtual OS between the > application and the OS, this way one writes to this one common > virtual OS (the VM) and not have to worry about the different > OS's below it. Those who knew the history of previous attempts to do this sort of thing could already predict why it wasn’t going to succeed.