Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!lust.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcm9pZOKAlFdoeQ==?= Dalvik? Followup-To: comp.lang.java.programmer Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 19:11:28 +1200 Organization: Geek Central Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 118-92-95-178.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Trace: lust.ihug.co.nz 1306739489 7891 118.92.95.178 (30 May 2011 07:11:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@ihug.co.nz NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 07:11:29 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: KNode/4.4.7 Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:4721 In message , Nasser M. Abbasi wrote: > On 5/29/2011 10:26 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > >> The issue is power consumption. Intel has been unable to drive down the >> power usage of x86 chips to offer serious competition to ARM. > > Do you think the new intel 3D chips would do that? Not a chance. They’ve already tacitly given up on phones for now, but are still making a big noise about tablets. Though I’ve yet to hear of any significant design wins. The only advantage to having x86 on a tablet is the ability to run Windows. And nobody seems to care about that.