Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!lust.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcm9pZOKAlFdoeQ==?= Dalvik? Followup-To: comp.lang.java.programmer Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 12:44:31 +1200 Organization: Geek Central Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 118-92-95-178.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Trace: lust.ihug.co.nz 1306716271 27282 118.92.95.178 (30 May 2011 00:44:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@ihug.co.nz NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 00:44:31 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: KNode/4.4.7 Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:4704 In message , BGB wrote: > ... register-based VMs are not necessarily non-portable, just the > performance argument is a bit weak, especially on x86 ... Which, interestingly, is not very popular for ultramobile devices. > although they still use the Java language, which could itself be a > factor in a legal sense ... How come? Is the licence for the Sunacle JDK (which is what I use for compiling programs) violated in any way?