Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lew Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: tools for programming applets Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 09:55:13 -0400 Organization: albasani.net Lines: 42 Message-ID: References: <028d2009-98b7-43a3-b02d-83eaa89db79e@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: news.albasani.net wK3E5SIdXW8Uxm7zJSdRVXGheMQ60565jB6arp3bOw1SW1fBpMwuNMA+lqiuwMnJO8fVXY11yoPI+QSAWvlQeN324U7g9qaoiVRpno2bLt0jFCQyx/x5j7hWtW4ZWGaJ NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:54:26 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: news.albasani.net; logging-data="cgzGAp6Y98iTcQRUaEMCEqgmqn2e+YA6gWozgSTKY0leJihSl2rc69YDiNmlQgB74hS1rgW4FGA9Son3aLoLIm2elDOc2Jny+V5OU4mqtQ+Eepm+3LVOKlHs1tO3ZYT0"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:dOa/WQfTFT/8QZKE+U1yEnJoyKk= Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:4647 Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: >> Lawrence D'Oliveiro: >>> Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: >>>> Which languages have a jQuery equivalent? >>>> jQuery is rather fat library for the things it does. >>>> It does a lot of things wrong, does not teach developers >>>> of learning the standard DOM, in turn teaches developers not doing things right, >>>> and finally adds quite a bit amount of crap going over the network which developers >>>> and users end up not really using. >>> So put your coding skills where your mouth is, and offer up something >>> better. >>>> If you go to comp.lang.javascript you'll get quite negative opinion on the usefulness >>>> of the jQuery library from the experts. >>> It still offers functionality in places where Java doesn’t even have >>> places. >> You're obviously making silly remarks and no arguments. You've >> stripped and haven't replied to my question "Which languages have a >> jQuery equivalent?". > If you insist: “certainly not Java”. > > Own goal, anyone? Once again, silly remark and no argument. The question is what languages BESIDES Java DO have such a thing. The point is that the other languages don't either, so there is no advantage to any language on that score. You know that, you just don't have an answer to the valid point, so you engage in your stupid nonsense, Lawrence. Point goes to Stanimir, Lawrence. Next time, Lawrence, try addressing the point instead of pulling these intellectually dishonest pony tricks, Lawrence. -- Lew Honi soit qui mal y pense. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/Friz.jpg