Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lew Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: tools for programming applets Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 09:04:13 -0400 Organization: albasani.net Lines: 38 Message-ID: References: <028d2009-98b7-43a3-b02d-83eaa89db79e@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com> <41dd1d4d-400b-4801-81cd-0136cc505faf@y27g2000prb.googlegroups.com> <7be10367-5f4b-4738-a5f5-0b6eb2769dd3@r33g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <884c9970-4a08-4606-8aff-a4b47e945134@q32g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.albasani.net H2E0oICF44wkay4YYClj4y55bdxFoz6x2Gr+4iUG7DUx2Ebztmp75nir3ZfMZDN3C9M8gcZZiIlR4Y+JA68qlZK/6J+wkKDyvVaVZf0Kzq7QkWrfgHugq9Bnf5vrRVzc NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 13:03:35 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: news.albasani.net; logging-data="t7fZmi1y+Km5rAowJDqhMaB2p2CSmQ5vDGBBuiwE86l/XD1ZNJ6hcITgmo2t5DipKyQWI21+x2Vvwu59OOE+qLniq3OiOzq4hC9WwY6fA0jcienPfS3TR4XMkDrz26PY"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:VzTE2AViFHTqDtMurfD5VNkyg/o= Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:4598 On 05/26/2011 08:57 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > In message > <884c9970-4a08-4606-8aff-a4b47e945134@q32g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, Alessio > Stalla wrote: > >> On May 25, 2:06 am, Lawrence D'Oliveiro> central.gen.new_zealand> wrote: >> >>> In message >>> <7be10367-5f4b-4738-a5f5-0b6eb2769...@r33g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, >>> Alessio >>> >>> Stalla wrote: >>>> What if in the OP's case the server is backed by a 1TB database? >>> >>> 1TB drives can be had for pocket change these days. >>> >>> What was the problem, again? >> >> I'm not talking about disk space costs, duh! I'm talking about >> complexity especially ... > > Rsync can replicate an entire file structure, no matter how complex. > >> , and also time, bandwidth... you can't duplicate a big DB at a snap of >> your fingers ... > > Considering how many days this thread has seen such pointless arguments back > and forth, you would have finished copying that terabyte database by now. [APPLAUSE] Lawrence, your reasoning is sound and your points are correct on this matter. -- Lew Honi soit qui mal y pense. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/Friz.jpg