Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #4085
| From | Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: SSL client program |
| Date | 2011-05-14 21:23 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <iqmkru$a7a$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <iqjms0$na3$1@dont-email.me> <iqjnug$3q4$1@dont-email.me> <fb2ff79f-640c-47ad-a5b8-7462811e5cf1@y31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> <iqm7ed$2mu$1@dont-email.me> <15a44075-786e-4a37-862f-c37171ab1b2f@c26g2000vbq.googlegroups.com> |
On 14/05/2011 18:48, Stone allegedly wrote:
> You mentioned:
>> So the problem appears to
>> be between what your Java program sends and what your C++ daemon
>> expects, not between what your Java program sends and OpenSSL, as I had
>> surmised.
>
> Does it mean that in Java code should be someone encoded message for C+
> + daemon?
(Please don't quote signatures)
No, it means that your C++ daemon doesn't understand the SSL version
Java is talking to it with.
> I have write down to my code your Java code and result of
> SSLContext.getInstance("TLS").getClass().getName() is
> "javax.net.ssl.SSLContext"
Sorry, my mistake. You need to have a look at:
SSLContext.getInstance( [protocol] ).getProvider();
If it prints something with "SunJSSE", then you have the default one.
--
DF.
An escaped convict once said to me:
"Alcatraz is the place to be"
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
SSL client program Stone <phracek2@gmail.com> - 2011-05-13 01:09 -0700
Re: SSL client program Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-05-13 18:39 +0200
Re: SSL client program Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-05-13 18:57 +0200
Re: SSL client program Stone <phracek2@gmail.com> - 2011-05-14 01:54 -0700
Re: SSL client program Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-05-14 17:34 +0200
Re: SSL client program Stone <phracek2@gmail.com> - 2011-05-14 09:45 -0700
Re: SSL client program Stone <phracek2@gmail.com> - 2011-05-14 09:48 -0700
Re: SSL client program Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-05-14 21:23 +0200
Re: SSL client program Stone <phracek2@gmail.com> - 2011-05-14 12:34 -0700
Re: SSL client program Stone <phracek2@gmail.com> - 2011-05-14 11:35 -0700
Re: SSL client program Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-16 16:54 +1000
Re: SSL client program Stone <phracek2@gmail.com> - 2011-05-16 03:08 -0700
Re: SSL client program Stone <phracek2@gmail.com> - 2011-05-16 05:22 -0700
Re: SSL client program Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-17 09:33 +1000
Re: SSL client program Stone <phracek2@gmail.com> - 2011-05-19 01:46 -0700
Re: SSL client program Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-20 14:15 +1000
Re: SSL client program Stone <phracek2@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 01:56 -0700
Re: SSL client program Stone <phracek2@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 02:00 -0700
Re: SSL client program Stone <phracek2@gmail.com> - 2011-05-14 01:49 -0700
Re: SSL client program Lothar Kimmeringer <news200709@kimmeringer.de> - 2011-05-15 13:52 +0200
Re: SSL client program Stone <phracek2@gmail.com> - 2011-05-15 11:05 -0700
Re: SSL client program Lothar Kimmeringer <news200709@kimmeringer.de> - 2011-05-16 08:46 +0200
csiph-web