Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25702

Re: Java vs C++

Path	csiph.com!eeepc.pasdenom.info!news.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!203.109.252.33.MISMATCH!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!lust.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!not-for-mail
From	Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Java vs C++
Followup-To	comp.lang.java.programmer
Date	Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:11:24 +1300
Organization	Geek Central
Lines	31
Message-ID	<iinkcc$87t$3@lust.ihug.co.nz> (permalink)
References	<iijbfr$pb2$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> <iijrj2$i0g$1@news.eternal-september.org> <iil6on$qvo$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> <4d4eafea$0$23760$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <b5GdnQ-xIKYHc9PQnZ2dnUVZ_vCdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <iina03$2k6$1@lust.ihug.co.nz> <4d4f4d64$0$23755$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <iinj85$7j3$5@lust.ihug.co.nz> <4d4f5367$0$23761$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host	118-92-86-70.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8Bit
X-Trace	lust.ihug.co.nz 1297044684 8445 118.92.86.70 (7 Feb 2011 02:11:24 GMT)
X-Complaints-To	abuse@ihug.co.nz
NNTP-Posting-Date	Mon, 7 Feb 2011 02:11:24 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent	KNode/4.4.7
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:25702

Followups directed to: comp.lang.java.programmer

Show key headers only | View raw

In message <4d4f5367$0$23761$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>, Arne Vajhøj wrote:

> On 06-02-2011 20:52, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
>> In message<4d4f4d64$0$23755$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>
>>> On 06-02-2011 18:14, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>>>
>>>> In message<b5GdnQ-xIKYHc9PQnZ2dnUVZ_vCdnZ2d@earthlink.com>, Patricia
>>>> Shanahan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I am aware of one issue in the simple data types that reflects 32 bit
>>>>> architecture, JLS section 17.7, "Non-atomic Treatment of double and
>>>>> long".
>>>>>
>>>>> The big way in which Java is tied to 32 bit architectures is not in
>>>>> the simple data types. It is the maximum size of an array, String,
>>>>> Set, List etc.
>>>>
>>>> Also in the fact that array subscripts cannot be long.
>>>
>>> But that has nothing to do with simple data types.
>>
>> What is long?
> 
> A simple data type.
> 
> But it is still a characteristics of array not of long.

Which is a limitation that comes from a fixation on 32-bit architectures, 
without a thought for 64-bit ones.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-07 12:14 +1300
  Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-07 14:52 +1300
    Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-07 15:11 +1300
      Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-08 09:48 +1300
        Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-07 20:00 -0500
      Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-06 21:22 -0500
    Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-06 21:05 -0500
  Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-06 20:39 -0500

csiph-web