Path: csiph.com!eeepc.pasdenom.info!news.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!exi-transit.telstra.net!pit-in1.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!lust.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Java vs C++ Followup-To: comp.lang.java.programmer Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 12:28:42 +1300 Organization: Geek Central Lines: 7 Message-ID: References: <4d4d585c$0$81476$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <4d4d60dc$0$23763$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <4d4d8322$0$41117$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: 118-92-86-70.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: lust.ihug.co.nz 1297034922 3033 118.92.86.70 (6 Feb 2011 23:28:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@ihug.co.nz NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 23:28:42 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: KNode/4.4.7 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:25585 In message , Joshua Cranmer wrote: > Try, for example, implementing both List and List in > the same class. Java will tell you that you cannot do it. C++, on the > other hand, wouldn't bat an eye. Why does Java impose such a pointless restriction?