Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Gene Wirchenko Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 13:47:06 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 28 Message-ID: References: <500cbc5d$0$295$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <3qcr08lkpvcmhe0drpffhegusd6k2a1670@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="c0a6a1dc41fc92eb7000e57afbd16211"; logging-data="25348"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+zQ9fad48rbquZMHW5OvYCFXqoKVxuaVc=" X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 Cancel-Lock: sha1:PfvS1ArVSHjuehfo6jZZW+ITlUY= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:16314 On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:44:11 -0400, "John B. Matthews" wrote: [snip] >I would argue that a single click from any included class or interface >qualifies as "easily found." Naturally one may wish for more. When Java >5—a particularly eventful revision—was new to me, I kept a copy of the >API under local version control for the purpose of adding/updating >useful links. YMMV One also has to know that it exists. I do not remember seeing the stuff at page top that I see now. I was primarily concerned with individual classes, so I must have missed it. One big disadvantage of on-line documentation is that sometimes, bits of it are hidden or not in obvious places. Hard-copy documentation has the advantage of nothing being hidden. If you go through the whole book, you get all of the content. Sincerely, Gene Wirchenko Sincerely, Gene Wirchenko