Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Steven Simpson Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Javadoc rethinking? Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:49:17 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 8 Message-ID: References: <3b10d0bb-0307-4365-b762-d619fd3c608b@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a32430be6b898f4e9a5cdb7da3325096"; logging-data="27965"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18uE9zJmT7LWzrm6ODDFIR5LiM+uRmqAk0=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 In-Reply-To: <3b10d0bb-0307-4365-b762-d619fd3c608b@googlegroups.com> Cancel-Lock: sha1:linCjadwNNsUJSpREPn6wMamY7c= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:21444 On 16/01/13 15:38, bob smith wrote: > However, Javadocs don't support images, and it is not necessarily good for the crucial documentation to be mingled with the code. -- ss at comp dot lancs dot ac dot uk